Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
faq [2019/04/05 16:06] profitview |
faq [2019/06/06 11:48] profitview |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
<panel title="3) - How do I request a trial for ProfitView?"> | <panel title="3) - How do I request a trial for ProfitView?"> | ||
- | We don't offer a ProfitView trial however it's free to try out ''BitMEX Testnet'', ''Coinbase Pro Sandbox'', ''Deribit Testnet'' and ''Gemini Sandbox''! | + | We don't offer a ProfitView trial however it's free to try out ''BitMEX Testnet'', ''Bybit Testnet'', ''Coinbase Pro Sandbox'', ''Deribit Testnet'', ''Gemini Sandbox'' and ''OANDA Sandbox''! |
</panel> | </panel> | ||
- | <panel title="4) - How much do the OCC & Multipass Indicators cost?"> | + | <panel title="4) - How much do the OCC & Multipass Indicators cost?"> |
- | OCC & Multipass are each offered at an annual cost of 0.1 BTC per year. | + | OCC & Multipass are each offered at an **annual cost** of ''$479.99'' per year. |
</panel> | </panel> | ||
<panel title="5) - How much does ProfitView cost?"> | <panel title="5) - How much does ProfitView cost?"> | ||
- | ProfitView 1.0 is offered as a lifetime subscription at a cost of 0.08 BTC. | + | ProfitView 1.x is offered as a **[[https://buy.profitview.app/|lifetime license]]** at a cost of ''$379.99'' or a **[[https://profitview.app/buy/monthly|monthly subscription]]** at a cost of ''$34.99''. |
</panel> | </panel> | ||
Line 144: | Line 144: | ||
At the same time you should then specify LESS number or retries (3-4) for your main position order by adding ''retries=<number>'' only to that line of your syntax. | At the same time you should then specify LESS number or retries (3-4) for your main position order by adding ''retries=<number>'' only to that line of your syntax. | ||
- | **Note:** According to the [[https://www.bitmex.com/api/explorer/#!/Order/Order_new|BitMEX API documentation]] position closing orders are considered "reduce only" by default, so for ''c=position'' commands there is **no need** to specify ''r=1'' – with the added benefit of normal closing orders being exempt from load shedding while "reduce only" orders can fail! | + | **Note:** According to the [[https://www.bitmex.com/api/explorer/#!/Order/Order_new|BitMEX API documentation]] and the [[https://blog.bitmex.com/api_announcement/load-shedding-and-close-execinst/|BitMEX Blog]] position closing orders are considered "reduce only" by default, so for ''c=position'' commands there is **no need** to specify ''r=1'' – with the added benefit of closing orders without a quantity (PV will omit this automatically for q >= 100%) being completely exempt from load shedding while "reduce only" orders can fail! |
</panel> | </panel> | ||